Model Evaluation - Batangas Explorer

Benchmark Comparison

-

FAHP Consistency Ratio

-

AHP Consistency Ratio

-

FAHP vs AHP (ρ)

-

Top-10 Overlap (%)

Model Pair	Spearman's ρ	Interpretation	Top-10 Overlap	Status

Sensitivity Analysis

Variation	Weight	Top-10 Stability	Avg Rank Change	Max Rank Change	Spearman's ρ

Variation	Weight	Top-10 Stability	Avg Rank Change	Max Rank Change	Spearman's ρ

Variation	Weight	Top-10 Stability	Avg Rank Change	Max Rank Change	Spearman's ρ

Robustness Assessment

Location Robustness

Location	Top-10 Stability	Spearman's ρ	Avg Rank Change	Status

Missing Data Robustness

Data Removal	Remaining Count	Top-10 Stability	Spearman's ρ	Status

Weight Combination Robustness

Combination	Weights	Top-10 Stability	Spearman's ρ	Consistency Ratio	Status

Efficiency Testing

-

Total Execution Time (ms)

-

Dataset Size

-

Avg Time/Item (ms)

-

Est. Throughput (req/s)

Model Performance Comparison

Model	Computation Time (ms)	Relative Performance	Status

Evaluation Component Breakdown

Component	Time (ms)	Percentage of Total

Performance Guidelines:

< 50ms: Excellent - Real-time performance
50-100ms: Good - Acceptable for interactive use
100-500ms: Fair - Noticeable delay
> 500ms: Poor - Requires optimization

Evaluation Summary

Evaluation Complete

All evaluation criteria have been assessed according to the Table 3-10 evaluation framework:

Model Validation: Benchmark comparison completed ✓
Accuracy Measurement: Correlation metrics calculated ✓
Sensitivity Testing: Weight variations tested ✓
Efficiency Testing: Response times measured ✓
Robustness Assessment: Stability under variations confirmed ✓

Overall Results

Evaluation Aspect	Method Used	Result	Status
Model Validation	Benchmark comparison, expert input	-	-
Accuracy Measurement	Spearman's ρ correlation	-	-
Sensitivity Testing	Weight variation and rank tracking	-	-
Efficiency Testing	Response time measurement	-	-
Robustness Assessment	Stability under input variation	-	-

Model Evaluation Dashboard

Evaluation Parameters